Food Choices and Social Distinctions among University Students in Hyderabad
By Prof. G Nagaraju
Introduction and Framework
This sociological study explores the views of students at the University of Hyderabad regarding dietary choices and social hierarchy. The research focuses on how food mediates caste and religious identities, specifically examining the historical concepts of purity and pollution. While traditional Indian social systems used food habits to maintain caste rankings—a process often referred to as Sanskritisation—this study investigates whether modern university spaces serve as a "laboratory" for new, more inclusive values.
Student Perceptions and Dietary Preferences
Based on an empirical study of 450 students, the research found that while hostel menus typically only include "safe" non-vegetarian items like chicken and mutton, the student body's actual tolerance for diverse foods is much higher than institutional policies suggest.
* Approximately 61% of students expressed a preference for non-vegetarian food items.
* Only 21% of the student population preferred a strictly vegetarian diet.
* About 41% of students were dissatisfied with current mess food, with negative attitudes often linked to students from middle- and upper-class backgrounds.
The Politics of Beef and Pork
The study highlights significant diversity in views regarding "prohibited" meats, challenging many popular stereotypes.
* Beef: While 72% of Hindu students and 60% of Christian students opposed serving beef, nearly one-third of Hindu respondents were either in favor or did not mind its presence. Among Dalit (SC) students, 61% were in favor of serving beef, viewing it as a secular and economic food choice.
* Pork: Around 42% of all students responded positively to pork as a potential menu option. Interestingly, 30% of Muslim students did not oppose the serving of pork, which challenges rigid religious stereotypes.
* Social Coding: Students often use code words like "Kalyani Biryani" or "peddodu" to discuss beef in the public sphere to avoid social stigma.
Conclusions and Policy Implications
The author concludes that academically promoted notions of "purity and pollution" are slowly losing their grip on youth. Over 60% of students indicated they are comfortable sharing a dining table with others consuming non-vegetarian food. The article suggests that "good governance" in a pluralistic democracy like India requires university administrations to respect the diverse food cultures of all students rather than imposing a single dominant cultural norm.
🔗 https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/0262728020944279
Comments
Post a Comment